Contrast before 1.16.0 is susceptible to remote attestation relay attacks. Contrast accepted any TEE attestation report that verified correctly and contained the expected firmware patch levels and software measurements, regardless of which machine produced it, so attestation was not bound to specific, physically trusted hardware. An attacker who can both intercept network traffic between the CLI and the Coordinator (or between the Coordinator and an attested component) and forge reports or extract secrets from any single TEE machine under their physical control can relay such a report to impersonate a Contrast Coordinator or a Contrast workload, defeating identity verification in Contrast's attested TLS (aTLS).

Missing permission checks in Jenkins Contrast Continuous Application Security Plugin 3.11 and earlier allow attackers with Overall/Read permission to enumerate the names of configured Contrast metadata.

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Contrast Continuous Application Security Plugin 3.11 and earlier allows attackers to have Jenkins connect to an attacker-specified URL using an attacker-specified username, API key, and service key.

A missing permission check in Jenkins Contrast Continuous Application Security Plugin 3.11 and earlier allows attackers with Overall/Read permission to connect to an attacker-specified URL using an attacker-specified username, API key, and service key.